Langsung ke konten utama

Postingan

Menampilkan postingan dari Maret, 2018

Comparing The Characteristic of Good Article from PDF Entitled Critically Reading Journal Articles

Hello… welcome guys! Today, I would like to share you about my last article that was I posted the review. So, today I won’t tell you more about the article. I just want to compare what involved in my article which I found with the PDF of my lecturer which she gave last meeting in the class. The article entitled, “ Native and Non-Native English Language Teachers: Student Perceptions in Vietnam and Japan” that written by Ian Walkinshaw1 and Duongthi Hoang Oanh2, 2014 has a very complete characteristic of a good article. The good characteristic of article based on PDF of Critical Reading Journal Article, are: 1.       Of course it has a specific title 2.       It has an abstract, include keywords after it 3.       Next, it has an Introduction 4.       The method 5.       Results 6.       The discussion 7.    ...

how can I find a research article?

hey hoo.... this night, I would like to share you about my experience of finding the article task from my lecturer. I found the article on the web named sage pub. It's so hard to found the real article. honestly, I make a mistake before this, what I downloaded was a journal, not an article. I realized if it's incorrect because I saw a little word on the top of the page. I really shocked about it because of I sent it to my lecturer, when I realized what's my fault, I soon search the real article and soon I send it to my lecturer in the WA. From my mistake, we can learn how to find the good article. I have some recommended website for you. but my favorite one is sagepub website. first thing you need to do is open the google ofcourse then you type www.sagepub.com after that you need to click article in the sagepub website. then you can search in the searching place with the topic of article that you want to search. thank you... hopefully it will help your task, good n...

What is The Author wants of the abstract of The Article entitled "Native and Non-Native English Language Teachers: Student Perceptions in Vietnam and Japan" by Ian Walkinshaw1 and Duongthi Hoang Oanh?

The teaching industry of English in East and Southeast Asia follows the assumption that native English teachers (NEST) are the gold standard of spoken and written language, while non-native English teachers are low educators because they lack this inherent linguistic skill. But does this premise fit the linguistic learner's perspective? In this article explores the advantages and disadvantages of learning English from NEST and non-NEST. Highlights a number of perceived advantages - and disadvantages - on both types of teachers. Students see NEST as a model of pronunciation and use of the correct language, as well as being a repository of cultural knowledge, but also finding poor NESTs in explaining grammar, and their different cultures create tension. Non-NEST is considered as good as a grammar teacher, and has the ability to use the student's first language when necessary. Students find the interaction class with non-NEST easier because of their shared culture. Non-NEST pronu...

Resume of Article Native and Non-Native English Language Teacher : Student Perception in Vietnam and Japan by Ian Walkinshaw and Duongthi Hoang Oanh

The issue of parity between native and non-native-speaker teachers needs to be foregrounded because even though the vast majority of English language teachers worldwide are non-NESTs, many non-NESTs in the ELT industry are sorely disenfranchised (see Cla rk & Paran, 2007, for the U.K. context). The issue is particularly salient in Asia, where native speakers are often the industry’s ideal model and American English the preferred variety (Young & Walsh, 2010). The current findings respond to questions about how these teachers are perceived by learners and what qualities they bring to the language classroom. Specifically, the data show that NESTs were valued as models for authentic, natural pronunciation, despite comprehensibility issues. Grammatical explanations were not viewed as a NEST forte (cf. Benke & Medgyes, 2005). Respondents appreciated learning about NESTs’ cultures, but also experienced a cultural and communicative gap in NEST-fronted classrooms. Also, NESTs ...